Follow Anne on Pinterest

Loading..

Style & Design

Black Book Magazine
British Vogue
Cooking Channel TV
Dazed Digital
Dezeen
Dossier Journal
Gotham Magazine
Home & Design
Industrie Magazine/Nowmanifest.com
Interview Magazine
Liqurious
Metropolis Magazine
New York Magazine
NYTimes Home & Garden
NOWNESS
Ode Magazine
On Earth
Organic Authority
STYLE
Taste Spotting
TheOnes2Watch
Travel + Leisure
Vanity Fair
Vogue.com
Vogue Paris
Vogue Italia
W Magazine
Wallpaper
Wine Spectator
WSJ Life, Culture, Magazine
Yatzer - Design To Share

Informed

Academic Earth Lectures
Al Jazeera English
Ahram Online
AlterNet
American Thinker
BBC
Bloomberg
City Journal
CNN Politics
Commentary
EcoSalon
Economist
Financial Times
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Policy
France 24
Good
Grist
Guardian UK
Harvard Magazine
Los Angeles Times
More Intelligent Life
Mother Jones
NPR Arts & Life
National Geographic
National Review
New York Times
New York Review of Books
Orion
Pew Research Center Online NewsHour|PBS
Politico
Psychology Today
Public Broadcasting System
Reason Magazine
Scientific American
Skeptic
Slate Magazine
Sydney Morning Herald
Telegraph UK
The Atlantic Magazine
The Christian Science Monitor
The Daily Beast
The Daily Green
The Hindu
The Huffington Post
The Nation
The National UAE
The New Republic
The New York Times
The New Yorker
The Root
The Times of India
Utne Reader
Vanity Fair
Wall Street Journal
Washington Post
Washington Times
World Changing
Whole Living
Xinhuanet
Yes Magazine

Sensual and Superyoung

Healthy, Sensual Living Blogs

Anne’s Sensual Vitality Blog

Health: Libido, Sexuality, Superyoung Longevity

 

« French Women Move Forward | American Women Not | Main | Chubby Birds Migrate More Efficiently »
Friday
Feb192010

Plan to Geoengineer Oceans for C02 Absorption Backfires

GreenTracker| As climate researchers grapple with the big questions of what to do about climate change, researchers at the Leibniz Institute of Marine Science have rejected the assumptions around a grandiose proposal that we capture CO2 in the oceans.

Details are in the article. What impresses us is that researchers employed a holistic modeling system, rather than a linear set of mathematical assumptions. Studying the assumptions in a ‘big picture’ model, scientists concluded that not only did the idea of capturing the CO2 in oceans not work from an efficacy standpoint — capturing only 10% of the ‘problem’ CO2 — but two new problems arose.

1) The trapped CO2 didn’t reside in the oceans, but on land, where the temperature also cooled in an unanticipated way.

2) If the system had to shut down for any reason, the CO2 released back into the atmosphere was worse than ever. It multiplied.

To date, climate change science has been presented to the public in bullet points and claims that the problem is ‘self-evident’. We say that reingineering Nature is enormously complex and to date, we lack confidence that the architects of these projects have actually ‘done the math’ so do speak.

If we believe that engineering humans is complex, Nature may be even more incongruous. Read on Liebniz Institute Rejects Geoengineering Oceans Scheme

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>