Follow Anne on Pinterest

Loading..

Style & Design

Black Book Magazine
British Vogue
Cooking Channel TV
Dazed Digital
Dezeen
Dossier Journal
Gotham Magazine
Home & Design
Industrie Magazine/Nowmanifest.com
Interview Magazine
Liqurious
Metropolis Magazine
New York Magazine
NYTimes Home & Garden
NOWNESS
Ode Magazine
On Earth
Organic Authority
STYLE
Taste Spotting
TheOnes2Watch
Travel + Leisure
Vanity Fair
Vogue.com
Vogue Paris
Vogue Italia
W Magazine
Wallpaper
Wine Spectator
WSJ Life, Culture, Magazine
Yatzer - Design To Share

Informed

Academic Earth Lectures
Al Jazeera English
Ahram Online
AlterNet
American Thinker
BBC
Bloomberg
City Journal
CNN Politics
Commentary
EcoSalon
Economist
Financial Times
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Policy
France 24
Good
Grist
Guardian UK
Harvard Magazine
Los Angeles Times
More Intelligent Life
Mother Jones
NPR Arts & Life
National Geographic
National Review
New York Times
New York Review of Books
Orion
Pew Research Center Online NewsHour|PBS
Politico
Psychology Today
Public Broadcasting System
Reason Magazine
Scientific American
Skeptic
Slate Magazine
Sydney Morning Herald
Telegraph UK
The Atlantic Magazine
The Christian Science Monitor
The Daily Beast
The Daily Green
The Hindu
The Huffington Post
The Nation
The National UAE
The New Republic
The New York Times
The New Yorker
The Root
The Times of India
Utne Reader
Vanity Fair
Wall Street Journal
Washington Post
Washington Times
World Changing
Whole Living
Xinhuanet
Yes Magazine

Sensual and Superyoung

Healthy, Sensual Living Blogs

Anne’s Sensual Vitality Blog

Health: Libido, Sexuality, Superyoung Longevity

 

« Wishing for a Haiti Earthquake for The Congo | Main | In Oregon Voters Raised Taxes »
Sunday
Jan312010

Carbon Traders Aroused Over Revived Cap & Trade Possibility

Photo Associated PressGreenTracker| The word after President Obama’s pro-environment comments in his “State of the Union” speech was that international carbon traders were back in the ballgame. Jad Mouawad writes in NYT GreenInc that the global carbon market is expected to total $170 billion this year, a 33 percent jump from 2009.

Everything we’re read suggests that when Congress gets to talking turkey on the environment (whenever that is), the growth of a new Wall Street ‘derivatives-like’ global trading market won’t be high on the agenda.

Pre-Copenhagen, a group of senators put alternatives on the table — including a US superfund for carbon emissions — that actually benefitted the taxpayers, as progress was made in not trading paper but actually reducing emissions.

We’re not experts on carbon trading, but who has an appetitie to create a Wall Street superfund that just passes paper around, without rewarding genuine progress for the environment?

It might be a good scheme for traders, but does carbon trading for profit really have legs? Does Congress really want a new cap and trade system? Call us skeptical. Anne

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>